<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And the Oscar Goes to&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.crowdflower.com/2010/03/and-the-oscar-goes-to/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.crowdflower.com/2010/03/and-the-oscar-goes-to/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:03:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Rivas</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdflower.com/2010/03/and-the-oscar-goes-to/#comment-2706</link>
		<dc:creator>George Rivas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crowdflower.com/2010/03/and-the-oscar-goes-too/#comment-2706</guid>
		<description>These results have more to do with segmentation than &quot;hive mind&quot;.  The audience is pre-selected to be Avatar fans: Heavy internet users = computer geeks = sci fi fans = Avatar worshippers (age range and gender is probably a factor too skewing towards young males... but this will only start arguments.)

Hence the overinflated view of Avatar.  How could it be &quot;Best&quot; picture when it wasn&#039;t even a &quot;good&quot; picture?  Interesting set theory problem.  It had great effects, but the story was one-dimensional, predictable, re-hashed, etc.  You didn&#039;t exactly need to be Nostradamus to see that trite, tree-hugging conclusion coming over the horizon.  This was judging the book by its 3D cover.

Next time, I would suggest gathering demographics from the respondents and throwing out any that don&#039;t fit the demographics of the target prediction set -- members of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences are mostly not web-addicted teenage boys.  Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These results have more to do with segmentation than &#8220;hive mind&#8221;.  The audience is pre-selected to be Avatar fans: Heavy internet users = computer geeks = sci fi fans = Avatar worshippers (age range and gender is probably a factor too skewing towards young males&#8230; but this will only start arguments.)</p>
<p>Hence the overinflated view of Avatar.  How could it be &#8220;Best&#8221; picture when it wasn&#8217;t even a &#8220;good&#8221; picture?  Interesting set theory problem.  It had great effects, but the story was one-dimensional, predictable, re-hashed, etc.  You didn&#8217;t exactly need to be Nostradamus to see that trite, tree-hugging conclusion coming over the horizon.  This was judging the book by its 3D cover.</p>
<p>Next time, I would suggest gathering demographics from the respondents and throwing out any that don&#8217;t fit the demographics of the target prediction set &#8212; members of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences are mostly not web-addicted teenage boys.  Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

